2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 2,985 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK (221 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 450 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK (510 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
Model | CLK | Renown |
Year Released | 2008 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2985 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2750 mm |