2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1960 Seat 600
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Seat 600 would be higher. At 3,198 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 1120 kg more than 1960 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1960 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Seat |
| Model | CLK | 600 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3198 cc | 598 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 19 HP |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2010 mm |
