2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1962 Volvo 120
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 3,198 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 685 kg more than 1962 Volvo 120.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 120. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1962 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | CLK | 120 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3198 cc | 1778 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 310 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 45 L |