2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1964 Mitsubishi 500
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Mitsubishi 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Mitsubishi 500 would be higher. At 3,198 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 1161 kg more than 1964 Mitsubishi 500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Mitsubishi 500. (34 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Mitsubishi 500.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1964 Mitsubishi 500 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
Model | CLK | 500 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3198 cc | 594 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 23 HP |
Torque | 310 Nm | 34 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 534 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 3170 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2070 mm |