2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1967 MG 1100
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 MG 1100 would be higher. At 5,461 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK (382 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 325 more horse power than 1967 MG 1100. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1967 MG 1100.
Because 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK (530 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 436 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 MG 1100. (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1967 MG 1100 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | MG |
| Model | CLK | 1100 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5461 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 382 HP | 57 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 530 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2380 mm |
