2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1969 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,198 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 525 kg more than 1969 Triumph 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1969 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
Model | CLK | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3198 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 310 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 236 km/hour | 154 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 64 L |