2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 4,266 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 725 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK (400 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. (145 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK has automatic transmission and 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma has manual transmission. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
Model | CLK | Sigma |
Year Released | 2008 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4266 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 86 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1755 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2520 mm |