2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 4,266 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 445 kg more than 1983 Volvo 240.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK (400 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volvo 240. (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | CLK | 240 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4266 cc | 2127 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1755 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2660 mm |