2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1996 Tata E220
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Tata E220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Tata E220 would be higher. At 4,266 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 385 kg more than 1996 Tata E220.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK (400 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Tata E220. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Tata E220. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK has automatic transmission and 1996 Tata E220 has manual transmission. 1996 Tata E220 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1996 Tata E220 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Tata |
Model | CLK | E220 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4266 cc | 2197 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1755 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2810 mm |