2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2001 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 205 kg more than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2001 Chevrolet Blazer | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Chevrolet |
Model | CLK | Blazer |
Year Released | 2008 | 2001 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3198 cc | 4294 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 310 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 88.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2720 mm |