2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2003 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 205 kg more than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Because 2003 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2003 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
Model | CLK | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3198 cc | 3995 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 310 Nm | 382 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 60 L |