2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2004 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 3,198 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 1 kg more than 2004 Subaru Outback.
Because 2004 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK (310 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Subaru Outback. (285 Nm). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2004 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Subaru |
Model | CLK | Outback |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3198 cc | 2999 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 212 HP |
Torque | 310 Nm | 285 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1694 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 64 L |