2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2005 Volvo S60
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 3,198 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 156 kg more than 2005 Volvo S60.
Because 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo S60 (350 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (310 Nm). This means 2005 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2005 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | CLK | S60 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3198 cc | 2435 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 257 HP |
Torque | 310 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1539 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 68 L |