2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 4,266 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK (400 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK has automatic transmission and 2010 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2010 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | CLK | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4266 cc | 1997 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 137 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 182 km/hour |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 65 L |