2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 3,198 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (310 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Jaguar |
| Model | CLK | XF |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3198 cc | 3000 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 271 HP |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 600 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.3 seconds | 5.9 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 70 L |
