2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 4,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS weights approximately 1235 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS (460 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 413 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Seat |
Model | CLS | 600 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4965 cc | 767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 460 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2010 mm |