2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 1980 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 6,208 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS weights approximately 970 kg more than 1980 Mercury Lynx.
Because 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 509 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS | 1980 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercury |
Model | CLS | Lynx |
Year Released | 2008 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6208 cc | 1597 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 630 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 102.2 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94.6 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2400 mm |