2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 1982 Volvo 265
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 6,208 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS weights approximately 500 kg more than 1982 Volvo 265.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 400 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 265. (230 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 265.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS | 1982 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | CLS | 265 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6208 cc | 2848 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 630 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 102.2 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94.6 mm | 73 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2660 mm |