2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,985 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS (221 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS weights approximately 630 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rover |
Model | CLS | 200 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2985 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1410 mm |