2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs. 2002 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 6,208 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 150 kg more than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS.
Because 2002 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Dodge Ram. (305 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS | 2002 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Dodge |
| Model | CLS | Ram |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6208 cc | 3906 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 174 HP |
| Torque | 630 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 2070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2790 mm |
