2008 Mercedes-Benz E vs. 1972 Austin Allegro
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 2,685 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 795 kg more than 1972 Austin Allegro.
Because 2008 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz E (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Austin Allegro. (104 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz E | 1972 Austin Allegro | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Austin |
Model | E | Allegro |
Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2685 cc | 1485 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 68 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1665 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 47 L |