2008 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1982 Austin Ambassador
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Ambassador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Ambassador would be higher. At 5,460 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML (382 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 299 more horse power than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (83 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Ambassador.
Because 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Austin Ambassador. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML (530 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 399 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Austin Ambassador. (131 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Austin Ambassador.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1982 Austin Ambassador | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Austin |
| Model | ML | Ambassador |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5460 cc | 1698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 382 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 530 Nm | 131 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2680 mm |
