2008 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1982 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 4,965 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 1150 kg more than 1982 Mercury Lynx.
Because 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mercury Lynx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML (460 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1982 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mercury |
Model | ML | Lynx |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4965 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 460 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2400 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 43 L |