2008 Mercedes-Benz ML vs. 1982 Volvo 260
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 675 kg more than 1982 Volvo 260.
Because 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Volvo 260. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 260. (230 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz ML | 1982 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | ML | 260 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2685 cc | 2849 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 73 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2045 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2660 mm |