2008 Mercedes-Benz R vs. 1962 Rover P5
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercedes-Benz R (190 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1962 Rover P5. (119 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 1962 Rover P5.
Because 2008 Mercedes-Benz R is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Rover P5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz R (597 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 379 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Rover P5. (218 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Rover P5.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz R | 1962 Rover P5 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rover |
Model | R | P5 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2987 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 597 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 45 L |