2008 Mercedes-Benz R vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercedes-Benz R (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 25 kg more than 2008 Mercedes-Benz R.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz R (350 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mercedes-Benz R | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
| Model | R | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3498 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 268 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3220 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |
