2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK weights approximately 178 kg more than 1963 Rover 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK (240 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Rover |
Model | SLK | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 91 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 85.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1212 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 54 L |