2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK weights approximately 965 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK (510 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 463 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Seat |
| Model | SLK | 600 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5439 cc | 767 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 355 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2010 mm |
