2008 Mercury Grand Marquis vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2008 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercury Grand Marquis (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 647 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercury Grand Marquis (373 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2008 Mercury Grand Marquis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercury Grand Marquis | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Mercury | Rover |
Model | Grand Marquis | 200 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1832 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5370 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1410 mm |