2008 Mercury Mariner vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 2008 Mercury Mariner is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mercury Mariner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercury Mariner (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercury Mariner should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 910 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercury Mariner (168 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2008 Mercury Mariner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mercury Mariner | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Mercury | Volvo |
| Model | Mariner | 220 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1776 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 168 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 12.3:1 | 8.7:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 45 L |
