2008 Mercury Milan vs. 1965 Zastava 1500

To start off, 2008 Mercury Milan is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mercury Milan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercury Milan (221 HP) has 168 more horse power than 1965 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercury Milan should accelerate faster than 1965 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercury Milan weights approximately 856 kg more than 1965 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2008 Mercury Milan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Zastava 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mercury Milan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercury Milan (278 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Mercury Milan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Zastava 1500. 2008 Mercury Milan has automatic transmission and 1965 Zastava 1500 has manual transmission. 1965 Zastava 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mercury Milan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: