2008 Mercury Sable vs. 1992 Rover 100
To start off, 2008 Mercury Sable is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercury Sable (260 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercury Sable weights approximately 1205 kg more than 1992 Rover 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercury Sable (332 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100. (135 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2008 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mercury Sable | 1992 Rover 100 | |
| Make | Mercury | Rover |
| Model | Sable | 100 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 102 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 91.1 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 79 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 870 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1380 mm |
