2008 Mercury Sable vs. 1999 Nissan XVL
To start off, 2008 Mercury Sable is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan XVL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan XVL would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercury Sable (260 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1999 Nissan XVL. (156 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan XVL.
Because 2008 Mercury Sable is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Nissan XVL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mercury Sable will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercury Sable (332 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan XVL. (310 Nm). This means 2008 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan XVL.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercury Sable | 1999 Nissan XVL | |
Make | Mercury | Nissan |
Model | Sable | XVL |
Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 310 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 80 L |