2008 Mercury Sable vs. 2003 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2008 Mercury Sable is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mercury Sable (260 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 2003 ZAZ Wagon.
Because 2008 Mercury Sable is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mercury Sable will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 2003 ZAZ Wagon has manual transmission. 2003 ZAZ Wagon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mercury Sable | 2003 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | Mercury | ZAZ |
Model | Sable | Wagon |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2330 mm |