2008 MG TF vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 MG TF is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 MG TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 MG TF (158 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 MG TF weights approximately 264 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 MG TF (174 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 MG TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2008 MG TF | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | MG | Nissan |
Model | TF | Cedric |
Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1194 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2540 mm |