2008 MG ZR vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2008 MG ZR is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2008 MG ZR. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2008 MG ZR.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 MG ZR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1983 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 2008 MG ZR has manual transmission. 2008 MG ZR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 MG ZR | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | MG | Ford |
| Model | ZR | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1396 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4690 mm |
