2008 MG ZT-T vs. 1998 Rover Mini

To start off, 2008 MG ZT-T is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover Mini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover Mini would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 MG ZT-T (256 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1998 Rover Mini. (62 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 MG ZT-T should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 MG ZT-T weights approximately 1119 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2008 MG ZT-T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 MG ZT-T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover Mini, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 MG ZT-T (411 Nm) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 2008 MG ZT-T will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.

Compare all specifications: