2008 MG ZT vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor
To start off, 2008 MG ZT is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2008 MG ZT. (134 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 2008 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor weights approximately 250 kg more than 2008 MG ZT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 MG ZT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (339 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 MG ZT. (215 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 MG ZT.
Compare all specifications:
2008 MG ZT | 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | |
Make | MG | Mitsubishi |
Model | ZT | Endeavor |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 3835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.3 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 19.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 81 L |