2008 Mini Cooper vs. 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2008 Mini Cooper is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 245 kg more than 2008 Mini Cooper.
Because 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mini Cooper | 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mini | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Cooper | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2760 mm |
