2008 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1967 Renault 4
To start off, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,468 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1967 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 880 kg more than 1967 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mitsubishi Colt | 1967 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | Colt | 4 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 38 L |
