2008 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2004 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Suzuki XL7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Suzuki XL7 (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2008 Mitsubishi Colt. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki XL7 should accelerate faster than 2008 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 605 kg more than 2008 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Suzuki XL7 (250 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mitsubishi Colt. (160 Nm). This means 2004 Suzuki XL7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mitsubishi Colt | 2004 Suzuki XL7 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Suzuki |
Model | Colt | XL7 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1493 cc | 2736 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.6 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 64 L |