2008 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 255 kg more than 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander | 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Studebaker |
| Model | Outlander | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2359 cc | 2779 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2980 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |
