2008 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 102 more horse power than 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Because 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander (310 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mitsubishi Outlander | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Holden |
| Model | Outlander | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
