2008 Mitsubishi Space Star vs. 1966 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star. (113 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star weights approximately 45 kg more than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star (265 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star | 1966 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | Space Star | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1870 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 265 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2700 mm |
