2008 Mitsubishi Space Star vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan C 52 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan C 52 should accelerate faster than 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan C 52 weights approximately 27 kg more than 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star. (120 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star. 1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star has manual transmission. 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mitsubishi Space Star | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | Space Star | C 52 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1239 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2830 mm |
