2008 Nissan 350Z vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Nissan 350Z is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan 350Z (309 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 521 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan 350Z (358 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Nissan 350Z | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Nissan | Triumph |
Model | 350Z | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 309 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 358 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 95 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |