2008 Nissan Almera vs. 1963 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2008 Nissan Almera is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 1,597 cc, 2008 Nissan Almera is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Almera weights approximately 590 kg more than 1963 Toyota Corona.
Because 1963 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Almera (138 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Toyota Corona. (68 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan Almera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Nissan Almera | 1963 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Almera | Corona |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 997 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
| Torque | 138 Nm | 68 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 75 L |
