2008 Nissan Almera vs. 2004 Opel Tigra
To start off, 2008 Nissan Almera is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Opel Tigra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Opel Tigra would be higher. At 1,597 cc, 2008 Nissan Almera is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Almera weights approximately 1170 kg more than 2004 Opel Tigra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Almera (138 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Opel Tigra. (125 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan Almera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Opel Tigra.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Nissan Almera | 2004 Opel Tigra | |
Make | Nissan | Opel |
Model | Almera | Tigra |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1364 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 138 Nm | 125 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2405 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 17 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |