2008 Nissan Almera vs. 2010 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Nissan Almera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Nissan Almera would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Almera weights approximately 830 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Epica (237 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Almera. (138 Nm). This means 2010 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Almera.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Nissan Almera | 2010 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | Nissan | Chevrolet |
Model | Almera | Epica |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2490 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 138 Nm | 237 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2405 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.8 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 63 L |