2008 Nissan Frontier vs. 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2008 Nissan Frontier is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 305 kg more than 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud.
Because 2008 Nissan Frontier is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Frontier will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Nissan Frontier | 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
Make | Nissan | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Frontier | Silver Cloud |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3954 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2405 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 5380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.8 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 81 L |